Ask yourself: 1. Is an insect conscious? 2. Is a human conscious? If you answer yes to 2 (which you will if "conscious" has any meaning at all) but say no to 1 then you've drawn a line, but where does that line lie? Spider? Lizard? Cow? Cat? Monkey? Ape
RT @j2bryson: Depends what you mean by “conscious.” If you mean “moral subject” answer is “yes but we shouldn’t” https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo If…
RT @j2bryson: Depends what you mean by “conscious.” If you mean “moral subject” answer is “yes but we shouldn’t” https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo If…
RT @j2bryson: Depends what you mean by “conscious.” If you mean “moral subject” answer is “yes but we shouldn’t” https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo If…
RT @julianharris: The most concise and informative tweet on artificial consciousness ever. https://t.co/MgQVwKBbOP
RT @j2bryson: Depends what you mean by “conscious.” If you mean “moral subject” answer is “yes but we shouldn’t” https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo If…
RT @j2bryson: Depends what you mean by “conscious.” If you mean “moral subject” answer is “yes but we shouldn’t” https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo If…
RT @julianharris: The most concise and informative tweet on artificial consciousness ever. https://t.co/MgQVwKBbOP
RT @j2bryson: Depends what you mean by “conscious.” If you mean “moral subject” answer is “yes but we shouldn’t” https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo If…
RT @julianharris: The most concise and informative tweet on artificial consciousness ever. https://t.co/MgQVwKBbOP
I’ve been publishing in #aiethics since 1998, from the very beginning about over identification with AI leading to mistaken attributions of fear & hope directly to/in artefacts. Here’s my most recent paper on moral agency https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo
RT @j2bryson: Depends what you mean by “conscious.” If you mean “moral subject” answer is “yes but we shouldn’t” https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo If…
The most concise and informative tweet on artificial consciousness ever.
RT @j2bryson: Depends what you mean by “conscious.” If you mean “moral subject” answer is “yes but we shouldn’t” https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo If…
RT @j2bryson: Depends what you mean by “conscious.” If you mean “moral subject” answer is “yes but we shouldn’t” https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo If…
RT @j2bryson: Depends what you mean by “conscious.” If you mean “moral subject” answer is “yes but we shouldn’t” https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo If…
O zavesti strojev - #dnbnv (glej povezave) (da, ne bo ni vedel-a) 1 Kako pomembno lahko to vpliva na "nas"? ;) 2 Lahko ljudje (naša civilizacija) sploh še nadzorujemo razvoj strojev? 3 Poznate sploh koga, ki se s tem resno ukvarja in ima vpliv?
RT @j2bryson: Depends what you mean by “conscious.” If you mean “moral subject” answer is “yes but we shouldn’t” https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo If…
Depends what you mean by “conscious.” If you mean “moral subject” answer is “yes but we shouldn’t” https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo If you mean “has explicit memory” machines are more conscious than people https://t.co/evliQ7vJro if you mean what I mean–yes but NBD
@toth_o I’m increasingly seeing meetings taking this angle, which is also one part of the UN sustainable development goals, which other meetings organise around. But my own work makes the “instead” somewhat incoherent, — sustainability & HR are core to
Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics https://t.co/4RQRtlPTiw #ai #machinelearning #artificialintelligence via @j2bryson
Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics https://t.co/uDN8DfCF1c #AI #Ethics via @j2bryson
@Bharat_Ka_Putra @jeffreynsk We already have both those, it’s nbd https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo
RT @j2bryson: @JoshGellers @EmergTechEthics @David_Gunkel @PKathrani Yes, very useful for money laundering. It's already overextended, and…
@JoshGellers @EmergTechEthics @David_Gunkel @PKathrani Yes, very useful for money laundering. It's already overextended, and would be more so if applied to AI, it only works if humans are still dissuaded from bad behaviour. I hope you're making THAT clear.
@medieonie cf for legal attribution https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW for moral / social attribution https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo
Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics https://t.co/4RQRtlPTiw #ai #machinelearning #artificialintelligence via @j2bryson
Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics https://t.co/8NRE2tG9s0 #AI #Robotics via @j2bryson
RT @future_of_AI: Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics https://t.co/uDN8DfCF1c #AI #Ethics via…
Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics https://t.co/uDN8DfCF1c #AI #Ethics via @j2bryson
@Dowellenough @CjColclough @facebook @johnchavens @jonniepenn @benzevenbergen The best answers would be “no” or “only on behalf of a moral agent.” Cf https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo
@AndrewKemendo Cosplaying a fantasy / dystopia, not a future. Living with AGI (blog) https://t.co/FkWebAk0MP Patiency is not a virtue (academic paper) https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo
RT @j2bryson: @StenderWorld Robots aren’t a species we’re discovering, they’re increasingly pervasive technology we design. We get to choos…
RT @David_Gunkel: Another Opportun(ity) Question If as @j2bryson argues in @SpringerEthics "we are obliged not to build AI we are obliged t…
RT @David_Gunkel: Another Opportun(ity) Question If as @j2bryson argues in @SpringerEthics "we are obliged not to build AI we are obliged t…
RT @David_Gunkel: Another Opportun(ity) Question If as @j2bryson argues in @SpringerEthics "we are obliged not to build AI we are obliged t…
Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics https://t.co/uDN8DfCF1c #AI #Ethics via @David_Gunkel
Interesting exchange of views if you follow the replies
RT @David_Gunkel: Another Opportun(ity) Question If as @j2bryson argues in @SpringerEthics "we are obliged not to build AI we are obliged t…
Another Opportun(ity) Question If as @j2bryson argues in @SpringerEthics "we are obliged not to build AI we are obliged to," then should Opportunity not have been built? Was the very fabrication of the rover already a violation of this moral precept? https
Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics https://t.co/uDN8DfCF1c #AI #Ethics via @alan_winfield
@Birdonwing @rossdawson Yes, and if well designed, replaceable. https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo
RT @j2bryson: @StenderWorld Robots aren’t a species we’re discovering, they’re increasingly pervasive technology we design. We get to choos…
RT @j2bryson: @StenderWorld Robots aren’t a species we’re discovering, they’re increasingly pervasive technology we design. We get to choos…
RT @ProfSteveFuller: This article is asking all the right questions. I don't accept its conclusion, but that has to do with what it means t…
This article is asking all the right questions. I don't accept its conclusion, but that has to do with what it means to be 'human'. But the logic is worth following, since the issues raised will occupy more of the legal bandwidth in the coming years.
RT @j2bryson: @StenderWorld Robots aren’t a species we’re discovering, they’re increasingly pervasive technology we design. We get to choos…
@StenderWorld Robots aren’t a species we’re discovering, they’re increasingly pervasive technology we design. We get to choose whether they need defending by rights, and who would benefit if we choose to build them that way? https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo https:/
RT @j2bryson: @chophshiy @WLinAI @RecklessCoding have you read https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo ?
@chophshiy @WLinAI @RecklessCoding have you read https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo ?
@conjugateprior @tom_s_clark There’s at least 3 different ways algorithms can be racist, https://t.co/QZDhm5JLJE but you’re right in that it’s a shorthand to phrase it that way, although unfortunately there‘s a lot of identity confusion with #ai so not eve
RT @j2bryson: @EthicalBAU @ruchowdh @azeem @andrewchen @alan_winfield @David_Gunkel @josephreis It helps to make the uncertain APPEAR more…
@EthicalBAU @ruchowdh @azeem @andrewchen @alan_winfield @David_Gunkel @josephreis It helps to make the uncertain APPEAR more familiar, and is a dangerous form of deception. You are wrong that it is in all cases natural, we don't have issues using websearch
RT @j2bryson: @benwagne_r @RDBinns @1roboter see also https://t.co/IQFFVyDSJr and https://t.co/kuhJOKGRoO if you don't already cite them!!
@benwagne_r @RDBinns @1roboter see also https://t.co/IQFFVyDSJr and https://t.co/kuhJOKGRoO if you don't already cite them!!
@sean_welsh77 @HMRoff sounds compatible with my usages, which I would never claim to be universal, just comprehensible enough to communicate with in a document that defines them carefully at the beginning, e.g. https://t.co/kuhJOKGRoO or https://t.co/CZrY
RT @j2bryson: @iambhutia No. It's like ants, plants, and thermostats. We want #AI like that, we want humans to have human empathy, and to b…
RT @j2bryson: @iambhutia No. It's like ants, plants, and thermostats. We want #AI like that, we want humans to have human empathy, and to b…
RT @j2bryson: @sean_welsh77 @HMRoff Er that’s the definition of the term, look it up. But that doesn’t mean #ai systems can’t take moral ac…
@iambhutia No. It's like ants, plants, and thermostats. We want #AI like that, we want humans to have human empathy, and to be the moral agents. https://t.co/kuhJOKGRoO #aiethics
@sean_welsh77 @HMRoff Er that’s the definition of the term, look it up. But that doesn’t mean #ai systems can’t take moral actions, just that humans are accountable for their systems’ actions. https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo
RT @j2blather: @quickmuse @tobybottorf I love your answer, because of the "should". This is a normative question, not a scientific fact. We…
RT @j2blather: @quickmuse @tobybottorf I love your answer, because of the "should". This is a normative question, not a scientific fact. We…
RT @j2blather: @quickmuse @tobybottorf I love your answer, because of the "should". This is a normative question, not a scientific fact. We…
@quickmuse @tobybottorf I love your answer, because of the "should". This is a normative question, not a scientific fact. We as a society need to decide when it is OK to use #AI, and to regulate that. I agree, I think human-centric systems are the only sta
RT @j2bryson: @Grady_Booch @aimeevanrobot @AAmandasharkey Haven't read Aimee's paper yet–marking coursework :-/ But mine says that there's…
@Grady_Booch @aimeevanrobot @AAmandasharkey Haven't read Aimee's paper yet–marking coursework :-/ But mine says that there's no problem with robots taking moral actions, but that doesn't make them the moral agents, basically only humans can be {responsible
Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics https://t.co/4RQRtlPTiw #ai #machinelearning #artificialintelligence #consciousness #patiency via @j2bryson
@l_a_w_4_2 I guess you are defining the terms #consciousness & "real" #intelligence to mean moral #patiency, which isn't necessarily helpful. Could I suggest you read https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo on moral patiency, and if you still have time maybe https://t
RT @l_a_w_4_2: Until robots have philosophically soundly been attributed something like #consciousness AND (real) #intelligence, I agree wi…
@RikeFranke @JoshGellers @HMRoff @BoulaninSIPRI @drfranksauer @BVLSingler @paul_scharre @Miles_Brundage @aa_gilli If robots ever need rights we'll have designed them unjustly. https://t.co/TCYmYbKLaQ Moral patiency is not in itself a virtue https://t.co/ku
Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics https://t.co/uDN8DfCF1c #AI #Ethics via @RecklessCoding
RT @mvugt: .@j2bryson : when are machines/AI moral agents? https://t.co/3vRTf8dWF2 #CogComp2018
.@j2bryson : when are machines/AI moral agents? https://t.co/3vRTf8dWF2 #CogComp2018
RT @j2bryson: @FelixBoon @machine_ethics Yes, here's a paper on that with legal scholars: https://t.co/vOKx2ixPwL Here's more philosophy:…
RT @j2bryson: @FelixBoon @machine_ethics Yes, here's a paper on that with legal scholars: https://t.co/vOKx2ixPwL Here's more philosophy:…
One for you @Wolven
Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics https://t.co/uDN8DfCF1c #AI #Ethics via @j2bryson
@FelixBoon @machine_ethics Yes, here's a paper on that with legal scholars: https://t.co/vOKx2ixPwL Here's more philosophy: https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo And more pragmatism / engineering & regulation (draft, comments welcome): https://t.co/tl4aI08sdg with
Making AI moral agents or patients is an intentional and avoidable action. The normative argument *still open to debate* is that avoidance would be our most ethical choice @j2bryson Q: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? https://t.co/9gN3Hk40Fc
@kiddingthecity @DorotheaBaur @David_Gunkel @mitpress WRT the subtlety of the normative claims – yeah, that's 2 paragraphs in a probably doomed journal on machine consciousness. For a more nuanced discussion see my 2018 paper https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo Re the
Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics https://t.co/4RQRtlPTiw #ai #machinelearning #artificialintelligence via @j2bryson
@DOFFactory Yes, the A in AI is for Artefact, it’s something built deliberately, even if some of the design method uses nondeterminism, that too is a deliberate choice. https://t.co/kuhJOKGRoO
RT @future_of_AI: Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics https://t.co/uDN8DfCF1c #AI #Ethics via…
Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics https://t.co/uDN8DfCF1c #AI #Ethics via @j2bryson
@RaleighC The A in AI is "Artificial". If we don't maintain our accountability for devices we design, then we are just going to be exploited – BY OTHER HUMANS. Here are two formal papers about that. Legal case: https://t.co/vOKx2iPqoj moral philosophy cas
@AngusRobson5 @NoelSharkey @MattFenech83 @SilvioSchembri @vdignum @MullerCatelijne Unfortunately I'm terrible with names so I'm not sure whether Jennifer Robertson is one, do you have a link to a paper? Here's another formal article on the perspective just