RT @emulenews: Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Citation counts work better than a random baseline in distinguish…
RT @emulenews: Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Citation counts work better than a random baseline in distinguish…
Do citations and readership identify seminal publications? https://t.co/PBdXAJjPVE
Do citations and readership identify seminal publications? Our study comparing seminal publications and literature reviews in terms of their citation and reader counts: https://t.co/axr77NMlQy #Bibliometrics #Scientometrics #Informetrics #ResearchEvaluatio
RT @jasonpriem: Model not unable predict "seminal" research papers using Mendeley reader counts. But barely able to predict using citation…
RT @jasonpriem: Model not unable predict "seminal" research papers using Mendeley reader counts. But barely able to predict using citation…
Do citations and readership identify seminal publications?https://t.co/LZKSM3rlgV
RT @jasonpriem: Model not unable predict "seminal" research papers using Mendeley reader counts. But barely able to predict using citation…
RT @jasonpriem: Model not unable predict "seminal" research papers using Mendeley reader counts. But barely able to predict using citation…
RT @jasonpriem: Model not unable predict "seminal" research papers using Mendeley reader counts. But barely able to predict using citation…
RT @jasonpriem: Model not unable predict "seminal" research papers using Mendeley reader counts. But barely able to predict using citation…
RT @jasonpriem: Model not unable predict "seminal" research papers using Mendeley reader counts. But barely able to predict using citation…
RT @jasonpriem: Model not unable predict "seminal" research papers using Mendeley reader counts. But barely able to predict using citation…
Model not unable predict "seminal" research papers using Mendeley reader counts. But barely able to predict using citation counts, either (10% over baseline). Makes me suspect they need better models, rather than better data. https://t.co/tsR5AJ8viF #altme
RT @alexvespi: Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Spoiler: citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a…
RT @alexvespi: Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Spoiler: citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a…
RT @alexvespi: Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Spoiler: citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a…
RT @alexvespi: Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Spoiler: citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a…
RT @alexvespi: Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Spoiler: citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a…
RT @alexvespi: Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Spoiler: citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a…
RT @alexvespi: Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Spoiler: citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a…
RT @alexvespi: Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Spoiler: citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a…
RT @alexvespi: Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Spoiler: citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a…
RT @alexvespi: Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Spoiler: citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a…
RT @alexvespi: Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Spoiler: citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a…
RT @alexvespi: Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Spoiler: citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a…
RT @alexvespi: Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Spoiler: citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a…
RT @alexvespi: Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Spoiler: citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a…
RT @alexvespi: Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Spoiler: citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a…
Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Spoiler: citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a margin of 10%) in distinguishing excellent research, while Mendeley reader counts don't work better than the baseline. https://t.c
Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? Citation counts work better than a random baseline in distinguishing excellent research, while Mendeley @mendeley_com reader counts don't work better than the random baseline. https://t.co/rTDtI9MO
Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications?, https://t.co/xwPhrqmblF
RT @net_science: "Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications?. (arXiv:1802.04853v1 [cs.DL])" https://t.co/wToRLGZ0VC
Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications? https://t.co/nhjxOtnQUH
"Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications?. (arXiv:1802.04853v1 [cs.DL])" https://t.co/wToRLGZ0VC
Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications?. https://t.co/QofSTPOrIU
Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications?. (arXiv:1802.04853v1 [cs.DL]) https://t.co/wPqOhXDPOh #sociophysics
Do Citations and Readership Identify Seminal Publications?. (arXiv:1802.04853v1 [cs.DL]) https://t.co/Uhy3nWXHKb In this paper, we show that citation counts work better than a random baseline (by a margin of 10%) in distinguishing excellent research, whil