@EmRstats have you seen: https://t.co/OKLd5HsSrf
@TimoRoettger no no no, because with standard priors, the probability mass under 0 is 0 (as it is under any exact value)! You can decide a small effect that you consider practically equivalent to zero, and then you calculate the prob under that interval.
Background: @JeffRouder, @JuliaHaaf, @VandekerckhoveJ, “Bayesian inference for psychology, part IV: Parameter estimation and Bayes factors”: https://t.co/wXeoLkECjz
RT @tomfaulkenberry: Anyone wanting a clear explanation of the subtleties in Bayesian inference would do well to read this paper -- as usua…
RT @tomfaulkenberry: Anyone wanting a clear explanation of the subtleties in Bayesian inference would do well to read this paper -- as usua…
RT @tomfaulkenberry: Anyone wanting a clear explanation of the subtleties in Bayesian inference would do well to read this paper -- as usua…
RT @tomfaulkenberry: Anyone wanting a clear explanation of the subtleties in Bayesian inference would do well to read this paper -- as usua…
@dan_p_simpson @betanalpha (fyi, my query is pursuant to: https://t.co/ClOBvDHe1N)
RT @tomfaulkenberry: Anyone wanting a clear explanation of the subtleties in Bayesian inference would do well to read this paper -- as usua…
RT @tomfaulkenberry: Anyone wanting a clear explanation of the subtleties in Bayesian inference would do well to read this paper -- as usua…
RT @tomfaulkenberry: Anyone wanting a clear explanation of the subtleties in Bayesian inference would do well to read this paper -- as usua…
RT @tomfaulkenberry: Anyone wanting a clear explanation of the subtleties in Bayesian inference would do well to read this paper -- as usua…
Anyone wanting a clear explanation of the subtleties in Bayesian inference would do well to read this paper -- as usual, @JeffRouder, @JuliaHaaf, and @VandekerckhoveJ communicate complex ideas with precision and (when needed) useful informality. https://t
@Research_Tim @JoeHilgard Yeah wrong paper. Should be this one. Some people are too productive. https://t.co/SajxldnTYM
Bayesian inference for psychology, part IV: parameter estimation and Bayes factors | SpringerLink https://t.co/dQTz2ayzLo
New paper out! This is a fun one! https://t.co/rsCNH36UYO
Thinking "Bayesian" thoughts together with @kyn02666 #cogneuro: https://t.co/mo8WeVHs7H
"Bayesian" caught my attention Caught @psych2evidence's attention too #cogneuro: https://t.co/t3UeMQxLb8