Title |
Can automaticity be verified utilizing a perceptual load manipulation?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.3758/s13423-018-1444-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hanna Benoni |
Abstract |
A variety of studies tried to examine the fundamental question of whether specific processing is "automatic," that is, occurs without attention, by manipulating attention toward stimuli via the set-size manipulation of perceptual load. The present paper invites re-extermination of this common methodology of altering the perceptual load of a relevant task to manipulate attention toward peripheral stimuli. Four main arguments that propose alternative interpretations to the notion of automaticity in this line of studies are discussed, suggesting that automaticity cannot be verified utilizing manipulation of load, and outlining a plan for moving forward. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 17% |
Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 17 | 59% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 28% |