↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mathematical Sciences, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 111)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Journal of Mathematical Sciences, January 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1024856201493
Authors

T. Glimm, V. Oliker

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Researcher 3 27%
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 27%
Mathematics 3 27%
Engineering 2 18%
Computer Science 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2018.
All research outputs
#3,629,013
of 12,498,628 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Sciences
#10
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,249
of 344,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Sciences
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,498,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them