↓ Skip to main content


Overview of attention for article published in Euphytica, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

1 Wikipedia page


217 Dimensions

Readers on

210 Mendeley
Published in
Euphytica, January 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1018683119237

A.C. Zeven

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Italy 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 186 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 22%
Student > Master 35 17%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 43 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 155 74%
Environmental Science 19 9%
Unspecified 12 6%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 8 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2008.
All research outputs
of 12,361,872 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
of 658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 265,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,361,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 658 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them