So does this 2018 study from @mart1nkle1n: "Our analysis revealed that the text contents of the scientific papers generally changed very little from their pre-print to final published versions." https://t.co/UWY7oqSNEq
RT @phonedude_mln: @jcdl2023 @jessicapolka and also this work by @mart1nkle1n that showed little diff between preprints & published version…
RT @phonedude_mln: @jcdl2023 @jessicapolka and also this work by @mart1nkle1n that showed little diff between preprints & published version…
RT @phonedude_mln: @jcdl2023 @jessicapolka and also this work by @mart1nkle1n that showed little diff between preprints & published version…
RT @phonedude_mln: @jcdl2023 @jessicapolka and also this work by @mart1nkle1n that showed little diff between preprints & published version…
RT @phonedude_mln: @jcdl2023 @jessicapolka and also this work by @mart1nkle1n that showed little diff between preprints & published version…
RT @phonedude_mln: @jcdl2023 @jessicapolka and also this work by @mart1nkle1n that showed little diff between preprints & published version…
RT @phonedude_mln: @jcdl2023 @jessicapolka and also this work by @mart1nkle1n that showed little diff between preprints & published version…
@jcdl2023 @jessicapolka and also this work by @mart1nkle1n that showed little diff between preprints & published versions: Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-Print Versions https://t.co/UWY7oqTltY https://t.co/LITGByyuG6 #j
RT @JACoates: Abstracts and main text-body do not majorly change upon publication data: https://t.co/ihYrSCsV2o https://t.co/qqMdurGwKJ
RT @JACoates: Abstracts and main text-body do not majorly change upon publication data: https://t.co/ihYrSCsV2o https://t.co/qqMdurGwKJ
Abstracts and main text-body do not majorly change upon publication data: https://t.co/ihYrSCsV2o https://t.co/qqMdurGwKJ
@evornithology I understand the bean counter argument, but given that many manuscripts change very little during/after peer review having a preprint out there that everyone can read and check is much better than the other options https://t.co/hmSmAhPZf2
@i_petersen Not convinced peer-review adds much value (time & money spent on the process vs little change in the published version) https://t.co/So9oYiuvil. And more importantly“there is a danger of blurring the distinction between peer review and cens
@AndrewBarnas Although these find that in the two fields they examined, very little changed between preprints and final published versions. https://t.co/gC2PyItoPR
RT @KirkegaardEmil: Does peer review really alter papers much? Nope. Some people compared preprints to .. postprints, and showed that the t…
@Richvn @MotionPod @JACoates Here are 3 studies showing very few changes between submission and publication: * Klein et al., 2018 https://t.co/JJr6Z28CMO * Carneiro et al., 2020 https://t.co/eAmWwoFqDL * Polka et al., 2021 https://t.co/P2lLQYofSW
@Enroweb Oui j’ai en tête la version ultérieure de la revue IJDL https://t.co/cXcnMLGhcn qu’on aurait pu/dû citer en contexte général.
@patlogullo See this from @2weekSR https://t.co/XpYKsanjWr
@dnunan79 I know of these two also: Klein 2019: https://t.co/P3Z9gGx9o1 (interestingly, this was from pre-pandemic) Polka 2021: https://t.co/Xvd12aebE9 We were going to do a panel on this for WorldEBHCDay 2021 but ran out of time/capacity. Very interestin
Our analysis revealed that the text contents of the scientific papers generally changed very little from their pre-print to final published versions." https://t.co/V276WxpSv0
Comparing published scientific journal articles to their pre-print versions (2018) https://t.co/3IrGLRf9VD
RT @KeepItRheol: Thanks to all who participating in discussion re. very quick peer review! I finally consulted an expert (Jessica Lange, M…
Thanks to all who participating in discussion re. very quick peer review! I finally consulted an expert (Jessica Lange, McGill Librarian) who sent me some suggested reading: https://t.co/LwcZHNvatS https://t.co/yNn39Zsh3f https://t.co/W6ITMbaI0Q https:/
RT @DocAngNan: Peu de différences constatées entre les versions preprint et publiée d'un même article : mini étude en chimie https://t.co/…
RT @MariLeBechec: Je suppose que cette conclusion varie beaucoup en fonction des disciplines. Ce serait intéressant de faire une étude en S…
RT @DocAngNan: Peu de différences constatées entre les versions preprint et publiée d'un même article : mini étude en chimie https://t.co/…
RT @MariLeBechec: Je suppose que cette conclusion varie beaucoup en fonction des disciplines. Ce serait intéressant de faire une étude en S…
Je suppose que cette conclusion varie beaucoup en fonction des disciplines. Ce serait intéressant de faire une étude en SHS?
RT @DocAngNan: Peu de différences constatées entre les versions preprint et publiée d'un même article : mini étude en chimie https://t.co/…
RT @DocAngNan: Peu de différences constatées entre les versions preprint et publiée d'un même article : mini étude en chimie https://t.co/…
RT @DocAngNan: Peu de différences constatées entre les versions preprint et publiée d'un même article : mini étude en chimie https://t.co/…
RT @DocAngNan: Peu de différences constatées entre les versions preprint et publiée d'un même article : mini étude en chimie https://t.co/…
@DocAngNan Check out the abstract! https://t.co/rZFDQVAdyf
Peu de différences constatées entre les versions preprint et publiée d'un même article : mini étude en chimie https://t.co/wzdAuMWakN et des analyses plus importantes sur des corpus issus de ArXiv et BioarXiv https://t.co/L82kj4NPXW ou encore https://t.co
@DocAngNan Check out the abstract! https://t.co/rZFDQVAdyf
@CLANicholson @KathleeShearer This 2018 study showed that the truth is in between, closer to the "no change" end of the spectrum. "The text contents of the scientific papers generally changed very little from their pre-print to final published versions." h
RT @FarbThink: So true. For more see https://t.co/S1ow2kzoBH Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-Print Versions --…
RT @FarbThink: So true. For more see https://t.co/S1ow2kzoBH Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-Print Versions --…
RT @FarbThink: So true. For more see https://t.co/S1ow2kzoBH Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-Print Versions --…
So true. For more see https://t.co/S1ow2kzoBH Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-Print Versions -- Extended Version @mart1nkle1n @PeterBroadwell @liber8er #OA #OAWeek2020
@rdettogni and (maybe surprisingly) the published version is not so different from the preprint https://t.co/uKOXG4H4zL
@Kunkakom @JanaBerkessel Also here are some articles/preprints we found along the way: 1. https://t.co/Aawh99A7u6 2. https://t.co/xyjQIixqyf 3. https://t.co/csYpkheTrI
@Warish73 This study of 14,500 preprints https://t.co/sSmwg8reOe finds that pre-print to peer reviewed paper changes are generally minimal... Regardless, looking forward to reading the paper you teased the abstract of recently once it's in press!
RT @KarlZelik: "Our analysis revealed that the text contents of the scientific papers generally changed very little from their pre-print to…
RT @KarlZelik: "Our analysis revealed that the text contents of the scientific papers generally changed very little from their pre-print to…
"Our analysis revealed that the text contents of the scientific papers generally changed very little from their pre-print to final published versions." Thought-provoking & worthwhile read on the value proposition of academic publishers & peer revi
Comparing published scientific journal articles to their pre-print versions https://t.co/miGPRlkhRU
The study is available on arXiv https://t.co/PoT2rBrLHG
RT @KirkegaardEmil: Does peer review really alter papers much? Nope. Some people compared preprints to .. postprints, and showed that the t…
Does peer review really alter papers much? Nope. Some people compared preprints to .. postprints, and showed that the text is mostly the same. https://t.co/nkCD6hNnoy Someone should do this for their own paper because they posted the conference version!
RT @oaetc: ICYMI: the published papers mostly show NO significant differences from the respective @arxiv & #bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/…
Pre-prints are quite similar to the final version of the published papers: https://t.co/pvMm2DUlrT Interpret it as you want.
RT @oaetc: ICYMI: the published papers mostly show NO significant differences from the respective @arxiv & #bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/…
RT @oaetc: ICYMI: the published papers mostly show NO significant differences from the respective @arxiv & #bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/…
RT @oaetc: ICYMI: the published papers mostly show NO significant differences from the respective @arxiv & #bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/…
RT @oaetc: ICYMI: the published papers mostly show NO significant differences from the respective @arxiv & #bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/…
めっちゃ勉強になる 頭に栄養いるから1日断食は諦めた https://t.co/wHh1vENWGV
RT @oaetc: ICYMI: the published papers mostly show NO significant differences from the respective @arxiv & #bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/…
RT @oaetc: ICYMI: the published papers mostly show NO significant differences from the respective @arxiv & #bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/…
¿Aportan algo los editores de revistas científicas? Este artículo compara versiones pre-print con las publicadas y lo que descubre no parece justificar el sobrecoste de la edición comercial vía @Angelo_Freddy y @Docutradus https://t.co/JgB2yTtiY9 https://t
Para que invertir en grandes editoriales cuando los preprints tienen tan buena calidad, facilitan el escrutinio público y rápido; y aparentemente los editores no es como que aporten mucho a ello. https://t.co/AS3l5tYUob
@JeffSpies @VickySteeves Extended version (includes bioRxiv dataset): https://t.co/8cFVV0qdpr
RT @oaetc: ICYMI: the published papers mostly show NO significant differences from the respective @arxiv & #bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/…
RT @oaetc: ICYMI: the published papers mostly show NO significant differences from the respective @arxiv & #bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/…
RT @oaetc: ICYMI: the published papers mostly show NO significant differences from the respective @arxiv & #bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/…
RT @oaetc: ICYMI: the published papers mostly show NO significant differences from the respective @arxiv & #bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/…
RT @oaetc: ICYMI: the published papers mostly show NO significant differences from the respective @arxiv & #bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/…
ICYMI: the published papers mostly show NO significant differences from the respective @arxiv & #bioRxiv preprints https://t.co/jI2UvDPeTn cc @AcademicChatter @arXiv_BR @cshperspectives @emulenews @isidroaguillo #scicomm Free to read link ⬆️ made usin
RT @antoine_coutrot: "The text contents of the scientific papers generally changed very little from their pre-print to final published vers…
RT @PracheeAC: @brembs This? https://t.co/iEtfj4HEGM
"The text contents of the scientific papers generally changed very little from their pre-print to final published versions." https://t.co/WXUvFypDvV Also: the average publication fee is ~$4000/article https://t.co/6sBNVuGH6e
RT @petersuber: New studying trying to measure publishers' added value: "Our analysis revealed that the text contents of the scientific pap…
RT @Philipp_Mayr: @StephenEglen this one? https://t.co/dy7n1NdhnN #Munin2019
@StephenEglen this one? https://t.co/dy7n1NdhnN #Munin2019
RT @petersuber: New studying trying to measure publishers' added value: "Our analysis revealed that the text contents of the scientific pap…
RT @petersuber: New studying trying to measure publishers' added value: "Our analysis revealed that the text contents of the scientific pap…
RT @cibertecario02: Following the link, Springer asks me 44.39€ to buy an article that concludes that there aren't very significant differe…
RT @MarjoHamelin: Which means that papers that are finally published are those for which peer-review mainly suggested minor revisions. And…
Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre https://t.co/3pk21bG6V3 (Popularity:20.6) #Digital_Libraries
Which means that papers that are finally published are those for which peer-review mainly suggested minor revisions. And that papers have better chances to be accepted when they have no flaws at the submission stage.
RT @FWFOpenAccess: A study finds very little (@arxiv) and little (@biorxivpreprint ) differences between preprints and versions published b…
RT @SPARC_EU: New study: Comparing published scientific journal articles to their pre-print versions. https://t.co/yTw6BKoUvH
Comparing published scientific journal articles to their pre-print versions https://t.co/DRh9TOlYH5
RT @cibertecario02: Following the link, Springer asks me 44.39€ to buy an article that concludes that there aren't very significant differe…
RT @cibertecario02: Following the link, Springer asks me 44.39€ to buy an article that concludes that there aren't very significant differe…
RT @cibertecario02: Following the link, Springer asks me 44.39€ to buy an article that concludes that there aren't very significant differe…
RT @cibertecario02: Following the link, Springer asks me 44.39€ to buy an article that concludes that there aren't very significant differe…
A study finds very little (@arxiv) and little (@biorxivpreprint ) differences between preprints and versions published by publishers https://t.co/k2Y0RE0vay
RT @cibertecario02: Following the link, Springer asks me 44.39€ to buy an article that concludes that there aren't very significant differe…
😋
RT @cibertecario02: Following the link, Springer asks me 44.39€ to buy an article that concludes that there aren't very significant differe…
RT @cibertecario02: Following the link, Springer asks me 44.39€ to buy an article that concludes that there aren't very significant differe…
RT @cibertecario02: Following the link, Springer asks me 44.39€ to buy an article that concludes that there aren't very significant differe…
Following the link, Springer asks me 44.39€ to buy an article that concludes that there aren't very significant differences between preprints and published version! Fortunately, the preprint of the paper is available here https://t.co/KA9KjjMhiW
RT @SPARC_EU: New study: Comparing published scientific journal articles to their pre-print versions. https://t.co/yTw6BKoUvH
RT @SPARC_EU: New study: Comparing published scientific journal articles to their pre-print versions. https://t.co/yTw6BKoUvH