Unregistered Submission
The astonishing thing is that the duplicate paper has been cited 18 times while the "original" has been cited only 14 times. Who is responsible for correctng the literature? Springer? It is also very…
The astonishing thing is that the duplicate paper has been cited 18 times while the "original" has been cited only 14 times. Who is responsible for correctng the literature? Springer? It is also very…
An erratum has appeared:doi: 10.1007/s11627-015-9689-6http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11627-015-9689-6But the duplicate paper has not been retracted...
This is a duplicate publication.Chand, S., Singh, A.K., 2004. In vitro shoot regeneration from cotyledonary node explants of a multipurpose leguminous tree Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb...