↓ Skip to main content

Identification and classification of brain tumor MRI images with feature extraction using DWT and probabilistic neural network

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Informatics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
314 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
Title
Identification and classification of brain tumor MRI images with feature extraction using DWT and probabilistic neural network
Published in
Brain Informatics, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40708-017-0075-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Varuna Shree, T. N. R. Kumar

Abstract

The identification, segmentation and detection of infecting area in brain tumor MRI images are a tedious and time-consuming task. The different anatomy structure of human body can be visualized by an image processing concepts. It is very difficult to have vision about the abnormal structures of human brain using simple imaging techniques. Magnetic resonance imaging technique distinguishes and clarifies the neural architecture of human brain. MRI technique contains many imaging modalities that scans and capture the internal structure of human brain. In this study, we have concentrated on noise removal technique, extraction of gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features, DWT-based brain tumor region growing segmentation to reduce the complexity and improve the performance. This was followed by morphological filtering which removes the noise that can be formed after segmentation. The probabilistic neural network classifier was used to train and test the performance accuracy in the detection of tumor location in brain MRI images. The experimental results achieved nearly 100% accuracy in identifying normal and abnormal tissues from brain MR images demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed technique.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 256 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Student > Master 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Researcher 17 7%
Lecturer 13 5%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 120 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 57 22%
Engineering 47 18%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 125 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2018.
All research outputs
#18,584,192
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Brain Informatics
#82
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,890
of 442,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Informatics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them