↓ Skip to main content

Rhinitis Medicamentosa

Overview of attention for article published in Treatments in Respiratory Medicine, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Rhinitis Medicamentosa
Published in
Treatments in Respiratory Medicine, January 2005
DOI 10.2165/00151829-200504010-00003
Authors

Peter Graf

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Master 4 22%
Student > Postgraduate 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Unspecified 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 78%
Unspecified 3 17%
Psychology 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,601,668
of 9,673,602 outputs
Outputs from Treatments in Respiratory Medicine
#6
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,594
of 248,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Treatments in Respiratory Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,673,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 57th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 32 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them