↓ Skip to main content

On the structural definition of amyloid fibrils and other polypeptide aggregates

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
211 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
On the structural definition of amyloid fibrils and other polypeptide aggregates
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, May 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00018-007-7110-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Fändrich

Abstract

Amyloid fibrils occur inside the human body, associated with ageing or a group of diseases that includes, amongst others, Alzheimer's disease, atherosclerosis and type II diabetes. Many natural polypeptide chains are able to form amyloid fibrils in vivo or in vitro, and this ability has been suggested to represent an inherent consequence of the chemical structure of the polypeptide chain. Recent literature has provided a wealth of information about the structure of aggregates, precipitates, amyloid fibrils and other types of fibrillar polypeptide assemblies. However, the biophysical meaning associated with these terms can differ considerably depending on the context of their usage. This overview presents a structural comparison of amyloid fibrils and other types of polypeptide assemblies and defines amyloid fibrils, based on structural considerations, as fibrillar polypeptide aggregates with a cross-beta conformation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 271 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 27%
Student > Master 40 14%
Researcher 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Professor 15 5%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 38 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 15%
Chemistry 43 15%
Physics and Astronomy 14 5%
Engineering 11 4%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 45 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,460,684
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#571
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,289
of 72,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#5
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.