Characterizing drought in California: new drought indices and scenario-testing in support of resource management
Ecological Processes, January 2018
Lorraine E. Flint, Alan L. Flint, John Mendoza, Julie Kalansky, F. M. Ralph
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||9||15%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||5||8%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||7||12%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||7||12%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,709,170 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Processes
of 167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 452,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Processes
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,709,170 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.