RT @SteveStuWill: Are some truths too dangerous to tell? If so, should scientists lie? https://t.co/LukRjR6ljH https://t.co/G5PjFv9crD
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @Mangan150: Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting”- Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence https://t.co/PVgBV0RVhK
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
@Peoples_Science @EpigeneticsGuy @SJasanoff wouldn't such a stance ultimately "harm both science and society", see: https://t.co/kdGqCyDeOL
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
misrepresenting findings in science to achieve desirable social goals will ultimately harm both science and society https://t.co/hVg0E4q7i6
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
Cofnas: In certain areas, scientists judge theories on moral grounds, mislead the public to achieve social goals (!) https://t.co/1oauuxgzOI
RT @SteveStuWill: Are some truths too dangerous to tell? If so, should scientists lie? https://t.co/LukRjR6ljH https://t.co/G5PjFv9crD
RT @SteveStuWill: Are some truths too dangerous to tell? If so, should scientists lie? https://t.co/LukRjR6ljH https://t.co/G5PjFv9crD
RT @SteveStuWill: Are some truths too dangerous to tell? If so, should scientists lie? https://t.co/LukRjR6ljH https://t.co/G5PjFv9crD
RT @SteveStuWill: Are some truths too dangerous to tell? If so, should scientists lie? https://t.co/LukRjR6ljH https://t.co/G5PjFv9crD
RT @Mangan150: Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting”- Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence https://t.co/PVgBV0RVhK
RT @Mangan150: Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting”- Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence https://t.co/PVgBV0RVhK
Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting”- Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence https://t.co/PVgBV0RVhK
Mycket bra artikel som visar hur ideologi och "moral" förstör seriös forskning om bl.a. rasliga #IQ-skillnader http://t.co/cixWw7CiDz #svpol
I'm reading Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting” - http://t.co/ci3C5rdW9q #Intelligence #Science
I'm reading Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting” - http://t.co/ci3C5rdW9q #Intelligence #Science
Science is not always “self-correcting” http://t.co/eAihNr45BV