RT @NoahCarl90: An important paper by @nathancofnas, arguing that science is not always "self-correcting" https://t.co/7M6H2LdCrX https://t…
RT @nathancofnas: In 2015 I published a paper documenting prominent scientists saying that we should lie about group diffs in intelligence…
RT @nathancofnas: In 2015 I published a paper documenting prominent scientists saying that we should lie about group diffs in intelligence…
RT @nathancofnas: In 2015 I published a paper documenting prominent scientists saying that we should lie about group diffs in intelligence…
RT @nathancofnas: In 2015 I published a paper documenting prominent scientists saying that we should lie about group diffs in intelligence…
RT @NoahCarl90: An important paper by @nathancofnas, arguing that science is not always "self-correcting" https://t.co/7M6H2LdCrX https://t…
RT @nathancofnas: In 2015 I published a paper documenting prominent scientists saying that we should lie about group diffs in intelligence…
RT @nathancofnas: In 2015 I published a paper documenting prominent scientists saying that we should lie about group diffs in intelligence…
RT @nathancofnas: In 2015 I published a paper documenting prominent scientists saying that we should lie about group diffs in intelligence…
RT @nathancofnas: In 2015 I published a paper documenting prominent scientists saying that we should lie about group diffs in intelligence…
RT @NoahCarl90: An important paper by @nathancofnas, arguing that science is not always "self-correcting" https://t.co/7M6H2LdCrX https://t…
RT @nathancofnas: In 2015 I published a paper documenting prominent scientists saying that we should lie about group diffs in intelligence…
RT @NoahCarl90: An important paper by @nathancofnas, arguing that science is not always "self-correcting" https://t.co/7M6H2LdCrX https://t…
Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting” Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence by @nathancofnas https://t.co/9XorM9LbBh
RT @NoahCarl90: An important paper by @nathancofnas, arguing that science is not always "self-correcting" https://t.co/7M6H2LdCrX https://t…
RT @nathancofnas: In 2015 I published a paper documenting prominent scientists saying that we should lie about group diffs in intelligence…
In 2015 I published a paper documenting prominent scientists saying that we should lie about group diffs in intelligence for moral reasons. It didn't have much of an impact, but I think most ppl would be surprised that the public positions of intellectuals
RT @NoahCarl90: An important paper by @nathancofnas, arguing that science is not always "self-correcting" https://t.co/7M6H2LdCrX https://t…
RT @NoahCarl90: An important paper by @nathancofnas, arguing that science is not always "self-correcting" https://t.co/7M6H2LdCrX https://t…
An important paper by @nathancofnas, arguing that science is not always "self-correcting" https://t.co/7M6H2LdCrX https://t.co/NO3vLWwUTN
@disneyphish @VonkLevi Gardner's words here are self-damning. *This* is pseudo-science. Source: https://t.co/UrmItZbxVg https://t.co/inq18vmGTq
@dibyeshanand @bgprior @TrevorPTweets @afneil @benshapiro Maybe give this a read: https://t.co/lXqvbeLdAE
It science self-correcting? Yes, but it can be very slow. https://t.co/tHVYJRjlYe Especially when scientific progress is being biased by politics. https://t.co/lXqvbeLdAE https://t.co/xKwbQQ1RhA
@spongeworthy2 @Steve_Sailer BTW, you might like these two articles: https://t.co/AXaP3Q85QR https://t.co/JDtDqh4AJH
@EPoe187 ... scientifically correct but they are nevertheless morally wrong: https://t.co/JDtDqh4AJH Honestly, it does baffle me as to how reality can be morally wrong. I mean, there are facts which I don't like, but this doesn't make them any less valid
@razibkhan @nathancofnas has a good angle on this here https://t.co/M4KF1zX7yx
@renegadetensai @NSesardic has some examples and @nathancofnas has a paper on this topic https://t.co/8Dn0WbVPez
@PhillyEliKaplan @SamHarrisOrg @ezraklein @voxdotcom And if you want research on how MI are bunk, wikipedia is good enough: https://t.co/a5J93vQ7uo IQ actually explains a huge part of MI scores! And Gardner himself said he doesn't care about evidence: htt
RT @StuartJRitchie: Sources: https://t.co/B0M9d0jxIO and https://t.co/L3eelvknRI
Esse artigo é um exemplo do quão arriscado é pesquisar/afirmar coisas sobre QI/inteligência, mesmo no âmbito acadêmico https://t.co/BJXSyzSABp
RT @StuartJRitchie: Sources: https://t.co/B0M9d0jxIO and https://t.co/L3eelvknRI
RT @StuartJRitchie: Sources: https://t.co/B0M9d0jxIO and https://t.co/L3eelvknRI
RT @StuartJRitchie: Sources: https://t.co/B0M9d0jxIO and https://t.co/L3eelvknRI
Sources: https://t.co/B0M9d0jxIO and https://t.co/L3eelvknRI
RT @Pale_Primate: Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting” Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence https://t.co/eXLqkXXnw0
RT @fsnole1: Truly important reading on controversial topics in science & what the costs can be. https://t.co/yGWzVa4AKf https://t.co/oAtY6…
RT @MelricMelnibone: "Theories related to group differences in intelligence are often rejected a priori on explicitly moral grounds." https…
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
FWIW and FYI Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting” Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence https://t.co/2b1fYaq0rK
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @StefanMolyneux: New Paper: Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting” Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence https://t.co/3Al…
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @StefanMolyneux: New Paper: Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting” Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence https://t.co/3Al…
RT @StefanMolyneux: New Paper: Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting” Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence https://t.co/3Al…
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @StefanMolyneux: New Paper: Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting” Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence https://t.co/3Al…
RT @StefanMolyneux: New Paper: Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting” Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence https://t.co/3Al…
RT @StefanMolyneux: New Paper: Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting” Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence https://t.co/3Al…
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @Mangan150: Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting”- Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence https://t.co/PVgBV0RVhK
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @Mangan150: Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting”- Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence https://t.co/PVgBV0RVhK
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
@StefanMolyneux Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting” Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence: https://t.co/AErKaSWWMz
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
"Theories related to group differences in intelligence are often rejected a priori on explicitly moral grounds." https://t.co/kOWCBRsVbO
RT @Mangan150: Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting”- Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence https://t.co/PVgBV0RVhK
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @Mangan150: Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting”- Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence https://t.co/PVgBV0RVhK
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @SteveStuWill: Are some truths too dangerous to tell? If so, should scientists lie? https://t.co/LukRjR6ljH https://t.co/G5PjFv9crD
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y
RT @clairlemon: When science is more self-censoring than self-correcting https://t.co/eJ3wTQNhw5 https://t.co/S2qR0XKN2Y