↓ Skip to main content

Non-nucleated erythrocytes in a teleostean fish Maurolicus Mülleri (Gmelin)

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, March 1956
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Non-nucleated erythrocytes in a teleostean fish Maurolicus Mülleri (Gmelin)
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, March 1956
DOI 10.1007/bf00338830
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karl Georg Wingstrand

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Lecturer 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 30%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 10%
Computer Science 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#545
of 2,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165
of 926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them