Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation

@DrNatalieStruve Of course seeing where you‘re coming from, argument certainly is valid. The discussion on actual effect and evidence of imoact on quality probably is as old as the review system itself. Found a number of examples in this 1997 study quite

@MichaelAWoodJr There is a lot of evidence of publishing bias. Example: https://t.co/EQPtZbSg24 Meta-analysis: https://t.co/amMWj2Zj56