↓ Skip to main content

Expected utility without utility

Overview of attention for article published in Theory and Decision, November 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Expected utility without utility
Published in
Theory and Decision, November 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00136129
Authors

E. Castagnoli, M. Li Calzi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 7%
Unknown 41 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 7 16%
Professor 4 9%
Lecturer 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 6 14%
Engineering 6 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 14%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Psychology 4 9%
Other 13 30%
Unknown 4 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Theory and Decision
#64
of 246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,719
of 28,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory and Decision
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them