↓ Skip to main content

Expected utility without utility

Overview of attention for article published in Theory and Decision, November 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 156)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Expected utility without utility
Published in
Theory and Decision, November 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00136129
Authors

E. Castagnoli, M. Li Calzi

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 9%
Unknown 31 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Master 5 15%
Lecturer 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 15%
Psychology 4 12%
Social Sciences 4 12%
Other 11 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,994,831
of 13,415,696 outputs
Outputs from Theory and Decision
#33
of 156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,231
of 278,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory and Decision
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,415,696 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.