↓ Skip to main content


Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychology Review, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

1 Wikipedia page


13 Dimensions

Readers on

45 Mendeley
Published in
Neuropsychology Review, January 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1020381913563

Holly James Westervelt, Robert J. McCaffrey

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 2 4%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Other 15 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 33%
Psychology 12 27%
Unspecified 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Chemistry 3 7%
Other 8 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2013.
All research outputs
of 12,342,529 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 267,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,342,529 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.