| Title |
Constructing M&A valuation: how do merger evaluation methods differ as uncertainty and controversy vary?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Organization Design, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41469-017-0025-y |
| Authors |
Hyoung-Goo Kang, Wonseok Woo, Richard M. Burton, Will Mitchell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 18 | 40% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2019.
All research outputs
#13,002,314
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Organization Design
#73
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,718
of 473,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Organization Design
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.