@EikoFried @Foreman1David @AndyEMaul Arnulf et al has some interesting work in this area with semantic overlap of items, Latent Semantic Analysis, and cleverly using Semantic spaces https://t.co/LDgh8zlNMA
@ashleylwatts @datingdecisions @keanan_joyner To add to this, bloated specifics re personality psych / cattell https://t.co/s6Vi0tFFeX Also, work by Dr. Arnulf on semantic similarity of items and implications (I think there are 2 papers) https://t.co/X
@JeffRouder Regarding your semantics comment. Here are related papers, mainly the first two links: https://t.co/XFXtLvP9ff
@djnavarro Found some papers by @JKArnulf References Coombs and others. Seems to be what you are getting at. https://t.co/QBgaxO54B5 https://t.co/ZpVq1jfQoL Looks like this is the Michell paper (1994): https://t.co/wghWLRoLqJ
RT @pash22: The failing measurement of attitudes: How semantic determinants of individual survey responses come to replace measures of atti…
The failing measurement of attitudes: How semantic determinants of individual survey responses come to replace measures of attitude strength https://t.co/Ydvrur8E8X via @JKArnulf
We demonstrate that most #leadership #surveys are not about what they are about: Everything but semantics disappears. Research on organizational behavior is not about behavior but about language. https://t.co/VoSBwDdDgy