↓ Skip to main content

The impact of depuration on mussel hepatopancreas bacteriome composition and predicted metagenome

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
The impact of depuration on mussel hepatopancreas bacteriome composition and predicted metagenome
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10482-018-1015-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. A. Rubiolo, A. Lozano-Leon, R. Rodriguez-Souto, N. Fol Rodríguez, M. R. Vieytes, L. M. Botana

Abstract

Due to the rapid elimination of bacteria through normal behaviour of filter feeding and excretion, the decontamination of hazardous contaminating bacteria from shellfish is performed by depuration. This process, under conditions that maximize shellfish filtering activity, is a useful method to eliminate microorganisms from bivalves. The microbiota composition in bivalves reflects that of the environment of harvesting waters, so quite different bacteriomes would be expected in shellfish collected in different locations. Bacterial accumulation within molluscan shellfish occurs primarily in the hepatopancreas. In order to assess the effect of the depuration process on these different bacteriomes, in this work we used 16S RNA pyrosequencing and metagenome prediction to assess the impact of 15 h of depuration on the whole hepatopancreas bacteriome of mussels collected in three different locations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 24%
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 20%
Environmental Science 3 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,418,587
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#229
of 2,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,600
of 453,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#11
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.