↓ Skip to main content

Anamorphic Experiences in 3D Space: Shadows, Projections and Other Optical Illusions

Overview of attention for article published in Nexus Network Journal, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Anamorphic Experiences in 3D Space: Shadows, Projections and Other Optical Illusions
Published in
Nexus Network Journal, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00004-016-0298-4
Authors

Ioanna Symeonidou

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Design 4 40%
Arts and Humanities 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Other 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,580,083
of 12,379,581 outputs
Outputs from Nexus Network Journal
#12
of 61 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,088
of 337,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nexus Network Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,379,581 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them