↓ Skip to main content

Practices and consequences of using humanitarian technologies in volatile aid settings

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Humanitarian Action, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Practices and consequences of using humanitarian technologies in volatile aid settings
Published in
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41018-018-0029-4
Authors

Jori Pascal Kalkman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 21%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 50%
Engineering 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2018.
All research outputs
#577,703
of 13,644,402 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#12
of 59 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,928
of 349,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,644,402 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them