↓ Skip to main content

The Evolutionary History of Ehrhartoideae, Oryzeae, and Oryza

Overview of attention for article published in Rice, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 358)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
19 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
The Evolutionary History of Ehrhartoideae, Oryzeae, and Oryza
Published in
Rice, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12284-009-9022-2
Authors

Elizabeth A. Kellogg

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Sri Lanka 1 1%
Unknown 77 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 10 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,295,787
of 21,248,558 outputs
Outputs from Rice
#44
of 358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,445
of 322,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,248,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 358 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them