| Title |
The Evolutionary History of Ehrhartoideae, Oryzeae, and Oryza
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rice, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12284-009-9022-2 |
| Authors |
Elizabeth A. Kellogg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,716,900
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Rice
#52
of 396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,335
of 173,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 396 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them