| Title |
“In Ways Unacademical”: The Reception of Carleton S. Coon's The Origin of Races
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the History of Biology, June 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1010366015968 |
| Authors |
John P. Jackson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 31% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,376,184
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Biology
#78
of 503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,893
of 42,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Biology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them