98 followers
RT @Mario_Malicki: @coles_nicholas_ Yep in 2018 study by Hopewell et al., 50% of authors said one of the reasons they did changes was fear…
590 followers
@coles_nicholas_ Yep in 2018 study by Hopewell et al., 50% of authors said one of the reasons they did changes was fear of rejection if they don't. https://t.co/LFA90a6AA4
5,480 followers
査読がランダム化試験の主要評価項目や統計解析に与える影響。Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomised trials https://t.co/eR0lq1zDLz
373 followers
RT @Protohedgehog: New study: peer review usually improves papers, but also inappropriately asks for more work, while requesting toned down…
988 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
191 followers
RT @chrisdc77: Interesting parallel to reviewer-enforced HARKing in psychology (which is yet to be surveyed tmk). It should be considered e…
191 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
1,457 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
26,966 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
1,597 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
866 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
1,317 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
231 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
14,027 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
2,682 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
128 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
1,649 followers
RT @chrisdc77: Interesting parallel to reviewer-enforced HARKing in psychology (which is yet to be surveyed tmk). It should be considered e…
1,649 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
1,136 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
352 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
658 followers
I've said it before and I'll say it again: we need to talk about questionable editorial practices, QEP, distorting the scientific record. https://t.co/D2FTA9H2AB
105 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
1,650 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
3,203 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
4,028 followers
RT @chrisdc77: Interesting parallel to reviewer-enforced HARKing in psychology (which is yet to be surveyed tmk). It should be considered e…
6,077 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
2,569 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
1,993 followers
2,611 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
1,354 followers
RT @chrisdc77: Interesting parallel to reviewer-enforced HARKing in psychology (which is yet to be surveyed tmk). It should be considered e…
7,988 followers
Peer review is supposed to guard against bad science, but in reality it often encourages questionable research https://t.co/oQaP7lHBda
1,594 followers
RT @chrisdc77: Interesting parallel to reviewer-enforced HARKing in psychology (which is yet to be surveyed tmk). It should be considered e…
2,446 followers
RT @chrisdc77: Interesting parallel to reviewer-enforced HARKing in psychology (which is yet to be surveyed tmk). It should be considered e…
36,400 followers
RT @JelteWicherts: Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%)…
23,790 followers
Interesting parallel to reviewer-enforced HARKing in psychology (which is yet to be surveyed tmk). It should be considered editorial malpractice and/or incompetence to allow this to happen without the deviation being transparently declared in the paper. ht
4,437 followers
Survey among authors of 258 clinical trials shows that editors & peer reviewers ask for another primary outcome (in 3%), changes in analysis of primary outcome (27%), and supplementary (non-registered) analyses (36%). https://t.co/3bPrNObaJl
1,924 followers
So true ! poke @CageJulia https://t.co/uJsQAAnbr2
4,711 followers
RT @Protohedgehog: New study: peer review usually improves papers, but also inappropriately asks for more work, while requesting toned down…
1,593 followers
RT @Protohedgehog: New study: peer review usually improves papers, but also inappropriately asks for more work, while requesting toned down…
1,705 followers
RT @Protohedgehog: New study: peer review usually improves papers, but also inappropriately asks for more work, while requesting toned down…
16,709 followers
New study: peer review usually improves papers, but also inappropriately asks for more work, while requesting toned down conclusions https://t.co/balMDUi116 via @BioMedCentral
12 followers
RT @tlassers: Standard deviations. #RCT investigators on dealing with statistical #PeerReview https://t.co/1jZ7zE9twG
236 followers
Quality of #RCT reporting and peer review. RCTs form a large base of evidence in complex trauma, as INCiTE is assessing through #SystematicReview! #AcWri https://t.co/buRYv13Zly
6,306 followers
RT @tlassers: Standard deviations. #RCT investigators on dealing with statistical #PeerReview https://t.co/1jZ7zE9twG
5,672 followers
RT @tlassers: Standard deviations. #RCT investigators on dealing with statistical #PeerReview https://t.co/1jZ7zE9twG
1,305 followers
RT @tlassers: Standard deviations. #RCT investigators on dealing with statistical #PeerReview https://t.co/1jZ7zE9twG
2,315 followers
Standard deviations. #RCT investigators on dealing with statistical #PeerReview https://t.co/1jZ7zE9twG
12,020 followers
RT @kaz_yos: Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomis https://t.co/kUA3sFsPZv
1,778 followers
RT @kaz_yos: Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomis https://t.co/kUA3sFsPZv
6,072 followers
Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomis https://t.co/kUA3sFsPZv
1,279 followers
RT @MedicalEvidence: Investigating the influence of the #peerreview within biomedical journals on reporting of primary outcome(s) & statist…
4,342 followers
Investigating the influence of the #peerreview within biomedical journals on reporting of primary outcome(s) & statistical analyses of RCTs - really interesting research via #Trialsjournal: https://t.co/Lm9brjUuk1
1,636 followers
RT @EllaFlemyng: Influence of #peerreview on the reporting of primary outcome(s) & statistical analyses of RCT - new via #Trialsjournal: ht…
2,554 followers
1) mind-boggling to stick with a wrong analysis approach because it was planned. 2) what is important is transparency about unchanges made with justification. 3) nothing wrong with additional unplanned analyses if they help address research questions. http
5,548 followers
RT @MedicalEvidence: Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) & statistical analyses of randomized trials - new arti…
4,342 followers
Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) & statistical analyses of randomized trials - new article via #Trialsjournal: https://t.co/Lm9brjCSVr https://t.co/zUFumkesyZ
2,169 followers
RT @EllaFlemyng: Influence of #peerreview on the reporting of primary outcome(s) & statistical analyses of RCT - new via #Trialsjournal: ht…
1,056 followers
Influence of #peerreview on the reporting of primary outcome(s) & statistical analyses of RCT - new via #Trialsjournal: https://t.co/2kntygdQ66