↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity & Conservation, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Published in
Biodiversity & Conservation, January 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1024139813651
Authors

N. Bystriakova, V. Kapos, I. Lysenko, C.M.A. Stapleton

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 138 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 18%
Student > Master 25 17%
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Professor 10 7%
Other 39 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 47%
Environmental Science 31 21%
Unspecified 14 10%
Engineering 7 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 20 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2015.
All research outputs
#3,546,933
of 12,340,632 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity & Conservation
#520
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,156
of 268,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity & Conservation
#14
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,340,632 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.