Title |
Effect of tree-level airborne laser-scanning measurement accuracy on the timing and expected value of harvest decisions
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Forest Research, May 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10342-009-0282-6 |
Authors |
Markus Holopainen, Antti Mäkinen, Jussi Rasinmäki, Juha Hyyppä, Hannu Hyyppä, Harri Kaartinen, Risto Viitala, Mikko Vastaranta, Annika Kangas |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 36 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
Researcher | 8 | 21% |
Student > Master | 7 | 18% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Professor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 16 | 42% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 16% |
Engineering | 4 | 11% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2018.
All research outputs
#23,196,437
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Forest Research
#405
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,963
of 105,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Forest Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.