↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrotechnical Construction, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Hydrotechnical Construction, January 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1004107617449
Authors

G. G. Lapin

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2014.
All research outputs
#3,546,664
of 12,340,143 outputs
Outputs from Hydrotechnical Construction
#1
of 16 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,170
of 268,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrotechnical Construction
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,340,143 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them