↓ Skip to main content

Dreams Versus Reality: Plenary Debate Session on Quantum Computing

Overview of attention for article published in Quantum Information Processing, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 401)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Dreams Versus Reality: Plenary Debate Session on Quantum Computing
Published in
Quantum Information Processing, December 2003
DOI 10.1023/b:qinp.0000042203.24782.9a
Authors

Derek Abbott, Charles R. Doering, Carlton M. Caves, Daniel M. Lidar, Howard E. Brandt, Alex R. Hamilton, David K. Ferry, Julio Gea-Banacloche, Sergy M. Bezrukov, Laszlo B. Kish

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,529,972
of 12,302,355 outputs
Outputs from Quantum Information Processing
#47
of 401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,211
of 268,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quantum Information Processing
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,302,355 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 401 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.