| Title |
A network meta-analysis on the comparative efficacy of different dietary approaches on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Epidemiology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10654-017-0352-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lukas Schwingshackl, Anna Chaimani, Georg Hoffmann, Carolina Schwedhelm, Heiner Boeing |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 16% |
| Spain | 12 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 8% |
| Canada | 5 | 4% |
| India | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| Comoros | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 46 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 80 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 19% |
| Scientists | 12 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 483 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 483 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 79 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 79 | 16% |
| Researcher | 36 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 76 | 16% |
| Unknown | 160 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 83 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 51 | 11% |
| Unknown | 181 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 146. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#291,367
of 25,925,760 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#51
of 1,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,497
of 454,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.