RT @PessoaBrain: 1) 𝗔𝗿𝗲 "𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀" 𝗲𝗻𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵? https://t.co/mqoZhw38y2 "Complexity occurs when contextuality and radical openness cannot be cont…
RT @PessoaBrain: 1) 𝗔𝗿𝗲 "𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀" 𝗲𝗻𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵? https://t.co/mqoZhw38y2 "Complexity occurs when contextuality and radical openness cannot be cont…
RT @PessoaBrain: 1) 𝗔𝗿𝗲 "𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀" 𝗲𝗻𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵? https://t.co/mqoZhw38y2 "Complexity occurs when contextuality and radical openness cannot be cont…
RT @PessoaBrain: 1) 𝗔𝗿𝗲 "𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀" 𝗲𝗻𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵? https://t.co/mqoZhw38y2 "Complexity occurs when contextuality and radical openness cannot be cont…
RT @PessoaBrain: 1) 𝗔𝗿𝗲 "𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀" 𝗲𝗻𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵? https://t.co/mqoZhw38y2 "Complexity occurs when contextuality and radical openness cannot be cont…
RT @PessoaBrain: 1) 𝗔𝗿𝗲 "𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀" 𝗲𝗻𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵? https://t.co/mqoZhw38y2 "Complexity occurs when contextuality and radical openness cannot be cont…
RT @PessoaBrain: 1) 𝗔𝗿𝗲 "𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀" 𝗲𝗻𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵? https://t.co/mqoZhw38y2 "Complexity occurs when contextuality and radical openness cannot be cont…
1) 𝗔𝗿𝗲 "𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀" 𝗲𝗻𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵? https://t.co/mqoZhw38y2 "Complexity occurs when contextuality and radical openness cannot be contained ... it is not clear where the boundaries of the system are and which abstractions are the correct ones." https://t.co/pVZe23QlNp
Multiple approaches by @yoginho to the question "What is a system?" are here https://t.co/jdId03iqkv. Nice. I like "Is there a system an sich. Nein!" (after Chu https://t.co/ljf4J9sHN7), b/c system description, not system an sich, is what we have to work
@NimwegenLab @gepasi @EduEyras @NicholsonHPBio Last but not least, Dominique Chu makes a similar argument about complexity in https://t.co/bvwNXslYgd, and https://t.co/BwAjGgBeQz. He takes “system” to be an entirely observer-dependent description, like Ros