↓ Skip to main content

Planet X ? The current status

Overview of attention for article published in Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astronomy, March 1987
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Planet X ? The current status
Published in
Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astronomy, March 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf01234554
Authors

P. K. Seidelmann, R. S. Harrington

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2015.
All research outputs
#3,433,573
of 13,465,082 outputs
Outputs from Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astronomy
#70
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,585
of 280,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astronomy
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,465,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.