↓ Skip to main content

Men Who Have Sex with Transgender Women: Challenges to Category-based HIV Prevention

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
23 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Men Who Have Sex with Transgender Women: Challenges to Category-based HIV Prevention
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, August 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10461-007-9303-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Don Operario, Jennifer Burton, Kristen Underhill, Jae Sevelius

Abstract

Although transgender women are acknowledged as a priority population for HIV prevention, there is little knowledge on men who have sex with transgender women (MSTGWs). MSTGWs challenge conventional sexual orientation categories in public health and HIV prevention research, and warrant increased attention from the public health community. This paper used qualitative techniques to analyze how MSTGWs describe their sexual orientation identities, and to explore the correspondence between men's identities and sexual behaviors with transgender women. We conducted in-depth semi-structured individual interviews with 46 MSTGWs in San Francisco. We observed a diversity in the ways participants identified and explained their sexual orientation, and found no consistent patterns between how men described their sexual orientation identity versus their sexual behavior and attraction to transgender women. Findings from this qualitative study question the utility of category-based approaches to HIV prevention with MSTGWs and offer insights into developing HIV interventions for these men.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Canada 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
El Salvador 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Unknown 80 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 28 32%
Psychology 20 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,909,855
of 25,925,760 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#573
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,466
of 80,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.