Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation | SpringerLink - peer reviewing today and wondering how often reviewers are HARKING to improve the ms? @Nature https://t.co/
Nice read and a consolation :) 'contrary to initial assumptions, it is not the time taken to revise papers but the actual number of revisions that leads to greater...citation impact'. https://t.co/dp7vFNGdGe
RT @timelfen: @AthenaAktipis Pointers to other interesting work: on peer review as knowledge production as much as validation (https://t.co…
@AthenaAktipis Pointers to other interesting work: on peer review as knowledge production as much as validation (https://t.co/A9WAHd5d01); on how open review changes writing strategies of reviewers (https://t.co/pqC12wCTf2). There is lots of great scholars
RT @JelteWicherts: Getting past Reviewer 2 pays off: Articles that are revised more often garner more citations. https://t.co/JwfHZMn3k3
Interesting article on the value added to journal articles by the peer review process. Some consolation & encouragement for authors navigating the peer review process.
RT @donenda: Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citatio…
RT @donenda: Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citatio…
Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation | SpringerLink [open access] https://t.co/7vjCFVclSU
@Stephen_Curry Here is another one: https://t.co/OKYYSJY9U0
Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation (2018) https://t.co/2dekPozUkN
RT @philipshapira: "The more revisions a paper undergoes, the greater its subsequent recognition in terms of citations." New paper by John…
RT @philipshapira: "The more revisions a paper undergoes, the greater its subsequent recognition in terms of citations." New paper by John…
RT @philipshapira: "The more revisions a paper undergoes, the greater its subsequent recognition in terms of citations." New paper by John…
RT @philipshapira: "The more revisions a paper undergoes, the greater its subsequent recognition in terms of citations." New paper by John…
RT @philipshapira: "The more revisions a paper undergoes, the greater its subsequent recognition in terms of citations." New paper by John…
RT @philipshapira: "The more revisions a paper undergoes, the greater its subsequent recognition in terms of citations." New paper by John…
"The more revisions a paper undergoes, the greater its subsequent recognition in terms of citations." New paper by John Rigby, Deborah Cox, Keith Julian @AJRigbyTweet @MIOIR https://t.co/dxhS9InQNQ https://t.co/CxutpjylSB
RT @SimonGandevia: Revisions of your papers: does the number of revisions matter? https://t.co/pVZh5i38lf Maybe the more the better!
Revisions of your papers: does the number of revisions matter? https://t.co/pVZh5i38lf Maybe the more the better!
Revisions of your papers: does the number of revisions matter? https://t.co/ArUQmNfuDW Maybe the more the better!
RT @CWGAuthors: Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on cita…
Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation - https://t.co/3CFYl6pEsL #JournalPeerReview #AdvancedPackage #ScientificReview https://t.co/ZWZtmidtha
Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation. https://t.co/6vFelKEhZz
RT @sguerz_stefano: An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation. https://t.co/UOTsV9Ewdg
An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation. https://t.co/UOTsV9Ewdg
RT @Protohedgehog: Super interesting: The number of rounds of revision a paper goes through is related to its citation frequency (note: jou…
"Our detailed analysis suggests,[...] that it is [...] the actual number of revisions that leads to greater recognition for papers in terms of citation impact." The more revisions, the more citations? You see me skeptical... https://t.co/npScqTLj7K
RT @Protohedgehog: Super interesting: The number of rounds of revision a paper goes through is related to its citation frequency (note: jou…
Suggested read for those interested in the role and mechanics of #PeerReview: "... the review process may constitute a form of knowledge production and... not the simple correction of errors... in submitted papers" https://t.co/9V9fUq3RzB Full paper: https
Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation https://t.co/fs2aU8hXpT
RT @nichtich: actually peer-review is less a method of quality control but a tool to force people to read. https://t.co/NrK45oMfuM
RT @nichtich: actually peer-review is less a method of quality control but a tool to force people to read. https://t.co/NrK45oMfuM
actually peer-review is less a method of quality control but a tool to force people to read. https://t.co/NrK45oMfuM
RT @Protohedgehog: Super interesting: The number of rounds of revision a paper goes through is related to its citation frequency (note: jou…
RT @mirenebellini1: Peer review process as a form of knowledge production https://t.co/idtxyeiOJF
Peer review process as a form of knowledge production https://t.co/idtxyeiOJF
RT @Protohedgehog: Super interesting: The number of rounds of revision a paper goes through is related to its citation frequency (note: jou…
RT @Protohedgehog: Super interesting: The number of rounds of revision a paper goes through is related to its citation frequency (note: jou…
RT @Protohedgehog: Super interesting: The number of rounds of revision a paper goes through is related to its citation frequency (note: jou…
RT @Protohedgehog: Super interesting: The number of rounds of revision a paper goes through is related to its citation frequency (note: jou…
RT @Protohedgehog: Super interesting: The number of rounds of revision a paper goes through is related to its citation frequency (note: jou…
RT @Protohedgehog: Super interesting: The number of rounds of revision a paper goes through is related to its citation frequency (note: jou…
RT @Protohedgehog: Super interesting: The number of rounds of revision a paper goes through is related to its citation frequency (note: jou…
Super interesting: The number of rounds of revision a paper goes through is related to its citation frequency (note: journal n=1) https://t.co/WLjQD5u6D3 Blog post via @LSEImpactBlog https://t.co/qs5trHQkex
Publish and perish https://t.co/XOVPUiweZC
RT @HBrowman: “…the peer review process may constitute a form of knowledge production and is not the simple correction of errors contained…
RT @HBrowman: “…the peer review process may constitute a form of knowledge production and is not the simple correction of errors contained…
“…the peer review process may constitute a form of knowledge production and is not the simple correction of errors contained in submitted papers.” - https://t.co/oyvm2IXmRY https://t.co/8zEAxua97R
We could really do with evidence from a large pool of journals... @PEERe_REVIEW @squazzoni https://t.co/ZWIImyk6VH
'The #peerreview process may constitute a form of knowledge production' and 'not the simple correction of errors': evidence from single journal https://t.co/lwbK5QIeSq
RT @scigeist: Journal Peer Review: A Bar or Bridge? An Analysis of a Paper's Revision History and Turnaround Time, and the Effect on Citati…
Journal Peer Review: A Bar or Bridge? An Analysis of a Paper's Revision History and Turnaround Time, and the Effect on Citation https://t.co/UX2Q6RyIiv
RT @GoatsThatStare: Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on…
RT @GoatsThatStare: Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on…
Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation https://t.co/XZ0wmXrGwV
RT @jim_magnuson: In the moment, Reviewer X is insufferable. In retrospect, addressing even concerns that seem minor or pedantic almost alw…
RT @JelteWicherts: Getting past Reviewer 2 pays off: Articles that are revised more often garner more citations. https://t.co/JwfHZMn3k3
RT @JelteWicherts: Getting past Reviewer 2 pays off: Articles that are revised more often garner more citations. https://t.co/JwfHZMn3k3
RT @JelteWicherts: Getting past Reviewer 2 pays off: Articles that are revised more often garner more citations. https://t.co/JwfHZMn3k3
RT @wildscrutineer: Some rare good news about peer review! https://t.co/barJKbPBvd
In the moment, Reviewer X is insufferable. In retrospect, addressing even concerns that seem minor or pedantic almost always improves papers. https://t.co/SpyOk8CmP3
RT @JelteWicherts: Getting past Reviewer 2 pays off: Articles that are revised more often garner more citations. https://t.co/JwfHZMn3k3
RT @JelteWicherts: Getting past Reviewer 2 pays off: Articles that are revised more often garner more citations. https://t.co/JwfHZMn3k3
RT @JelteWicherts: Getting past Reviewer 2 pays off: Articles that are revised more often garner more citations. https://t.co/JwfHZMn3k3
RT @JelteWicherts: Getting past Reviewer 2 pays off: Articles that are revised more often garner more citations. https://t.co/JwfHZMn3k3
Super interesting study - and a great reminder as I currently work through revisions! https://t.co/B73PPKON19
RT @wildscrutineer: Some rare good news about peer review! https://t.co/barJKbPBvd
Data from one journal only, but still interesting - citation impact driven by number of revisions not time taken to revise https://t.co/CL01BKMNDj
RT @JelteWicherts: Getting past Reviewer 2 pays off: Articles that are revised more often garner more citations. https://t.co/JwfHZMn3k3
RT @JelteWicherts: Getting past Reviewer 2 pays off: Articles that are revised more often garner more citations. https://t.co/JwfHZMn3k3
RT @wildscrutineer: Some rare good news about peer review! https://t.co/barJKbPBvd
RT @wildscrutineer: Some rare good news about peer review! https://t.co/barJKbPBvd
RT @JelteWicherts: Getting past Reviewer 2 pays off: Articles that are revised more often garner more citations. https://t.co/JwfHZMn3k3
Some rare good news about peer review! https://t.co/barJKbPBvd
RT @JelteWicherts: Getting past Reviewer 2 pays off: Articles that are revised more often garner more citations. https://t.co/JwfHZMn3k3
RT @JelteWicherts: Getting past Reviewer 2 pays off: Articles that are revised more often garner more citations. https://t.co/JwfHZMn3k3
Getting past Reviewer 2 pays off: Articles that are revised more often garner more citations. https://t.co/JwfHZMn3k3