↓ Skip to main content

Pseudoscience, the paranormal, and science education

Overview of attention for article published in Science Education, October 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Pseudoscience, the paranormal, and science education
Published in
Science Education, October 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf00488452
Authors

Michael Martin

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Malaysia 1 3%
Unknown 33 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Researcher 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 22%
Psychology 4 11%
Unspecified 4 11%
Chemistry 3 8%
Other 5 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2015.
All research outputs
#3,537,644
of 12,319,267 outputs
Outputs from Science Education
#70
of 452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,125
of 268,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Education
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,319,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 452 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.