↓ Skip to main content

Consumers’ Responses to Public Figures’ Transgression: Moral Reasoning Strategies and Implications for Endorsed Brands

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Consumers’ Responses to Public Figures’ Transgression: Moral Reasoning Strategies and Implications for Endorsed Brands
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2544-1
Authors

Joon Sung Lee, Dae Hee Kwak

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 142 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 24%
Student > Master 22 15%
Professor 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 32 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 70 49%
Social Sciences 13 9%
Sports and Recreations 12 8%
Psychology 3 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 37 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,204,054
of 23,883,950 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#388
of 3,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,749
of 358,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#6
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,883,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.