↓ Skip to main content

Open-Cup Drinking Development: A Review of the Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Dysphagia (0179051X), December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Open-Cup Drinking Development: A Review of the Literature
Published in
Dysphagia (0179051X), December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00455-017-9871-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donna Scarborough, Katherine E. Brink, Michael Bailey-Van Kuren

Abstract

To date, a lack of published research studies exist that systematically analyze the factors involved with the progression of open-cup drinking in typically developing infants and toddlers. As a result, clinicians who are working with children that have delays in open-cup drinking development have a limited framework from which to base clinical decisions. The purpose of this review is to collate works from disparate and related fields to provide a brief review of the literature of pertinent sensorimotor and cognitive components necessary for successful open-cup drinking development.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 27%
Unspecified 3 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Unspecified 3 20%
Linguistics 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,126,216
of 13,799,368 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia (0179051X)
#73
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,453
of 394,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia (0179051X)
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,799,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.