| Title |
Effect of Repetition Duration During Resistance Training on Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-015-0304-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brad J. Schoenfeld, Dan I. Ogborn, James W. Krieger |
| Abstract |
Maximizing the hypertrophic response to resistance training (RT) is thought to be best achieved by proper manipulation of exercise program variables including exercise selection, exercise order, length of rest intervals, intensity of maximal load, and training volume. An often overlooked variable that also may impact muscle growth is repetition duration. Duration amounts to the sum total of the concentric, eccentric, and isometric components of a repetition, and is predicated on the tempo at which the repetition is performed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 335 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 64 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 51 | 15% |
| Spain | 30 | 9% |
| Canada | 15 | 4% |
| Australia | 8 | 2% |
| Brazil | 6 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 1% |
| Japan | 4 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 32 | 10% |
| Unknown | 118 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 234 | 70% |
| Scientists | 49 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 46 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 788 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 773 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 153 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 136 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 11% |
| Professor | 45 | 6% |
| Researcher | 44 | 6% |
| Other | 135 | 17% |
| Unknown | 190 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 379 | 48% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 3% |
| Other | 60 | 8% |
| Unknown | 212 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 296. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#120,960
of 25,884,216 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#105
of 2,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,271
of 362,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,884,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.