RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @callin_bull: Next time someone tells you that peer review is a gatekeeper and guarantor of scientific accuracy. https://t.co/Zo1R72TXc…
RT @callin_bull: Next time someone tells you that peer review is a gatekeeper and guarantor of scientific accuracy. https://t.co/Zo1R72TXc…
God is gonna get them for this.
Come for the bold title, but stay for the wild hypotheses and broad range of journals referenced you have never heard of. [Crass disclaimer—I haven’t read it...yet.]
RT @callin_bull: Next time someone tells you that peer review is a gatekeeper and guarantor of scientific accuracy. https://t.co/Zo1R72TXc…
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @MHendr1cks: Good thing this was peer reviewed, if it was just a preprint I might have doubted it's quality.and rigor. https://t.co/tUI9…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: There's 3 sigma batshit, and then there's three sigma batshit *for evolutionary psychology*. https://t.co/dLYMFpgXJ4 h/…
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @CT_Bergstrom: There's 3 sigma batshit, and then there's three sigma batshit *for evolutionary psychology*. https://t.co/dLYMFpgXJ4 h/…
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @JCesarPL: Ah, pero los estudios de género. https://t.co/oH7VrBCaqI
🤔🤦♀️
RT @JCesarPL: Ah, pero los estudios de género. https://t.co/oH7VrBCaqI
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
Ah, pero los estudios de género.
Intellectual dysgenics among Richard Lynn’s offspring.
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
“Evolutionary psychology” in a nutshell
RT @SergioEfe: Anoche, por culpa de este tuit, me tiré hasta la 1 leyendo papers de psicología evolucionista (unas risas). https://t.co/4Y0…
What the flying fuck
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @SergioEfe: Anoche, por culpa de este tuit, me tiré hasta la 1 leyendo papers de psicología evolucionista (unas risas). https://t.co/4Y0…
Evrimsel psikolojinin geldiği nokta ibretlik. Bilimsel yayıncılığın da. Biz bunları hep söyledik. https://t.co/uJvbePljpw
Wait what
I don't know which is more amazing: that this paper exists or that the first author is ad hominem attacking a commenter on this tweet. 🤔
Per the crackpot paper linked here, my left-handed atheism is a result of mutations brought on by the industrial revolution, which prevented my kind from being killed by the natural order.
Anoche, por culpa de este tuit, me tiré hasta la 1 leyendo papers de psicología evolucionista (unas risas). https://t.co/4Y0jHLPXn2
Dutton has a history of plagiarizing. This was investigated at @UniOulu because he used university’s affiliation. Was not actually on payroll there. I became interested because he has published a new book about Oulu grooming gang @AdamRutherford
This probably why psychology won't go beyond 'soft science' stigma. How are they using these ridiculous premises anyway, and moreover, how this went through reviewers and got published?!
RT @MHendr1cks: Good thing this was peer reviewed, if it was just a preprint I might have doubted it's quality.and rigor. https://t.co/tUI9…
How???
Almost enough to cancel my Springer subscription
Not endorsing, but this paper is too je ne sais quoi not to pass along. Upshot: they argue atheism and paranormal belief are indicators of devolutionary mutation. @wheelhousessr
RT @CT_Bergstrom: There's 3 sigma batshit, and then there's three sigma batshit *for evolutionary psychology*. https://t.co/dLYMFpgXJ4 h/…
whoa.
This is what happens when a bigot tries to make their bigotry sound scientific Evolutionary pyschologists: Why won't anybody take us seriously!? https://t.co/TH2LWV5D3D https://t.co/ccXqhr1ilx
What do you expect from evolutionary psychology. Just so stories are the modus operandi, so of course all the people looking for a veneer of science for their power fantasies flock.
These racist clowns have published numerous similarly WTF papers in journals from purportedly reputable publishers - @SpringerNature, @WileyUpdates , @tandfnewsroom I’m talking about you
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @CT_Bergstrom: There's 3 sigma batshit, and then there's three sigma batshit *for evolutionary psychology*. https://t.co/dLYMFpgXJ4 h/…
RT @mart1oeil: Do you remember the so-called ‘Negative Flynn Effect’ ? Its author, Edward Dutton, is also the author of this wtf paper :…
I have no words... 🤣
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @CT_Bergstrom: There's 3 sigma batshit, and then there's three sigma batshit *for evolutionary psychology*. https://t.co/dLYMFpgXJ4 h/…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: There's 3 sigma batshit, and then there's three sigma batshit *for evolutionary psychology*. https://t.co/dLYMFpgXJ4 h/…
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @mart1oeil: Do you remember the so-called ‘Negative Flynn Effect’ ? Its author, Edward Dutton, is also the author of this wtf paper :…
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @callin_bull: Next time someone tells you that peer review is a gatekeeper and guarantor of scientific accuracy. https://t.co/Zo1R72TXc…
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
Tu te demandes vraiment si les "recherches" en psychologie évolutives ne sont pas un vaste poisson d'avril https://t.co/KUfGr4rSgq
RT @CT_Bergstrom: There's 3 sigma batshit, and then there's three sigma batshit *for evolutionary psychology*. https://t.co/dLYMFpgXJ4 h/…
RT @Uneheuredepeine: Attendez, j’ai bien lu là, ils sont en train d’écrire que l’athéisme provoque l’autisme ? https://t.co/o2EPFVpHsX
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @callin_bull: Next time someone tells you that peer review is a gatekeeper and guarantor of scientific accuracy. https://t.co/Zo1R72TXc…
Attendez, j’ai bien lu là, ils sont en train d’écrire que l’athéisme provoque l’autisme ?
A good example of just because something is published doesn't mean it is any good! #science
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
Do you remember the so-called ‘Negative Flynn Effect’ ? Its author, Edward Dutton, is also the author of this wtf paper :
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
👀😧
Hmyes... Atheists got mutant superpowers... now we’re at it, reptilians are a thing, yes? 🙄🧠⛏ https://t.co/AYKBhrCgbR
RT @CT_Bergstrom: There's 3 sigma batshit, and then there's three sigma batshit *for evolutionary psychology*. https://t.co/dLYMFpgXJ4 h/…
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @MHendr1cks: Good thing this was peer reviewed, if it was just a preprint I might have doubted it's quality.and rigor. https://t.co/tUI9…
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @CT_Bergstrom: There's 3 sigma batshit, and then there's three sigma batshit *for evolutionary psychology*. https://t.co/dLYMFpgXJ4 h/…
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
New from @peterboghossian @ConceptualJames & @HPluckrose 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/LKtOnEU0tc
RT @callin_bull: Next time someone tells you that peer review is a gatekeeper and guarantor of scientific accuracy. https://t.co/Zo1R72TXc…
As someone who works a lot with 'high mutational load,' the abstract for this paper is *wild*. I mean...WOW.
I spent 2 minutes blocking on the title. Then I read the abstract... I can't... what??
RT @callin_bull: Next time someone tells you that peer review is a gatekeeper and guarantor of scientific accuracy. https://t.co/Zo1R72TXc…
Hahahaha
RT @callin_bull: Next time someone tells you that peer review is a gatekeeper and guarantor of scientific accuracy. https://t.co/Zo1R72TXc…
What the what? 😳😂 https://t.co/L0sGDakmFx
RT @callin_bull: Next time someone tells you that peer review is a gatekeeper and guarantor of scientific accuracy. https://t.co/Zo1R72TXc…
RT @callin_bull: Next time someone tells you that peer review is a gatekeeper and guarantor of scientific accuracy. https://t.co/Zo1R72TXc…
RT @MHendr1cks: Good thing this was peer reviewed, if it was just a preprint I might have doubted it's quality.and rigor. https://t.co/tUI9…
RT @callin_bull: Next time someone tells you that peer review is a gatekeeper and guarantor of scientific accuracy. https://t.co/Zo1R72TXc…
I need to speak with my situs inversus worm mutants
If you needed any further proof that the evolutionary psychology field is a joke, here it is.
RT @MHendr1cks: Good thing this was peer reviewed, if it was just a preprint I might have doubted it's quality.and rigor. https://t.co/tUI9…
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @AdamRutherford: A mad paper in an evolutionary psychology journal, which is totally wtaf, is this for real 😳 https://t.co/cTs6U2hI8r
RT @CT_Bergstrom: There's 3 sigma batshit, and then there's three sigma batshit *for evolutionary psychology*. https://t.co/dLYMFpgXJ4 h/…
RT @callin_bull: Next time someone tells you that peer review is a gatekeeper and guarantor of scientific accuracy. https://t.co/Zo1R72TXc…