↓ Skip to main content

Hydrogen-rich water increases postharvest quality by enhancing antioxidant capacity in Hypsizygus marmoreus

Overview of attention for article published in AMB Express, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Hydrogen-rich water increases postharvest quality by enhancing antioxidant capacity in Hypsizygus marmoreus
Published in
AMB Express, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13568-017-0496-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Chen, Jinjing Zhang, Haibo Hao, Zhiyong Feng, Mingjie Chen, Hong Wang, Ming Ye

Abstract

In the present study, we aimed to assess the effect of hydrogen-rich water (HRW) on the physicochemical characteristics and antioxidant capacity of Hypsizygus marmoreus during 12 days of postharvest storage at 4 °C. Different concentrations of HRW (25, 50 and 100%) were tested, and our data showed that 25% HRW treatment had the most significant effect on preservation of nutrients in H. marmoreus compared with the control group. In addition, 25% HRW treatment significantly reduced the relative electrolyte leakage rate and malonaldehyde (MDA) content (P < 0.05) and increased anti-superoxide-radical (O2-) activity compared with the control group. The activities of antioxidants, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and glutathione reductase (GR) were activated by 25% HRW treatment, and the expression levels of these genes were also induced. These results suggested that HRW treatment could delay rot incidence in mushrooms during storage by regulating antioxidant defense ability. This study supplies a new and simple method to maintain the quality and extend the shelf life of mushrooms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 8 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 25%
Unspecified 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,485,357
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#186
of 1,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,263
of 440,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#9
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.