血管拡張性ショックでの目標血圧の個別化。 結果はnegative。議論あるところですね。 https://t.co/BmsR5mKQiG
RT @intensivecare_c: 血管拡張性ショック(敗血症含む)の血圧目標。 6時間以上初圧薬が必要な場合、高め目標の方が死亡率が高くなるかもしれない。... https://t.co/Um7J0qgdXt
RT @intensivecare_c: 血管拡張性ショック(敗血症含む)の血圧目標。 6時間以上初圧薬が必要な場合、高め目標の方が死亡率が高くなるかもしれない。... https://t.co/Um7J0qgdXt
RT @intensivecare_c: 血管拡張性ショック(敗血症含む)の血圧目標。 6時間以上初圧薬が必要な場合、高め目標の方が死亡率が高くなるかもしれない。... https://t.co/Um7J0qgdXt
RT @intensivecare_c: 血管拡張性ショック(敗血症含む)の血圧目標。 6時間以上初圧薬が必要な場合、高め目標の方が死亡率が高くなるかもしれない。... https://t.co/Um7J0qgdXt
RT @intensivecare_c: 血管拡張性ショック(敗血症含む)の血圧目標。 6時間以上初圧薬が必要な場合、高め目標の方が死亡率が高くなるかもしれない。... https://t.co/Um7J0qgdXt
RT @intensivecare_c: 血管拡張性ショック(敗血症含む)の血圧目標。 6時間以上初圧薬が必要な場合、高め目標の方が死亡率が高くなるかもしれない。... https://t.co/Um7J0qgdXt
RT @intensivecare_c: 血管拡張性ショック(敗血症含む)の血圧目標。 6時間以上初圧薬が必要な場合、高め目標の方が死亡率が高くなるかもしれない。... https://t.co/Um7J0qgdXt
RT @intensivecare_c: 血管拡張性ショック(敗血症含む)の血圧目標。 6時間以上初圧薬が必要な場合、高め目標の方が死亡率が高くなるかもしれない。... https://t.co/Um7J0qgdXt
RT @intensivecare_c: 血管拡張性ショック(敗血症含む)の血圧目標。 6時間以上初圧薬が必要な場合、高め目標の方が死亡率が高くなるかもしれない。... https://t.co/Um7J0qgdXt
RT @intensivecare_c: 血管拡張性ショック(敗血症含む)の血圧目標。 6時間以上初圧薬が必要な場合、高め目標の方が死亡率が高くなるかもしれない。... https://t.co/Um7J0qgdXt
血管拡張性ショック(敗血症含む)の血圧目標。 6時間以上初圧薬が必要な場合、高め目標の方が死亡率が高くなるかもしれない。... https://t.co/Um7J0qgdXt
RT @SCCMPresident: Pooled analysis of higher vs lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy in septic & vasodilatory shock https…
RT @jocherojas: Pooled analysis of higher versus lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy septic and vasodilatory shock https:/…
RT @jocherojas: Pooled analysis of higher versus lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy septic and vasodilatory shock https:/…
Pooled analysis of higher versus lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy septic and vasodilatory shock https://t.co/eSBJEzuFpD
RT @SCCMPresident: Pooled analysis of higher vs lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy in septic & vasodilatory shock https…
RT @SCCMPresident: Pooled analysis of higher vs lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy in septic & vasodilatory shock https…
RT @SCCMPresident: Pooled analysis of higher vs lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy in septic & vasodilatory shock https…
RT @SCCMPresident: Pooled analysis of higher vs lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy in septic & vasodilatory shock https…
RT @SCCMPresident: Pooled analysis of higher vs lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy in septic & vasodilatory shock https…
RT @SCCMPresident: Pooled analysis of higher vs lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy in septic & vasodilatory shock https…
RT @SCCMPresident: Pooled analysis of higher vs lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy in septic & vasodilatory shock https…
In blood pressure more can be less and worse https://t.co/VohzMchjnb
Pooled analysis of higher vs lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy in septic & vasodilatory shock https://t.co/qU4rHGD3Kt https://t.co/arLasAJX8K
RT @JoeAlcockMD: Does normalizing blood pressure in sepsis increase risk of death? More mortality with higher blood pressure targets in pat…
RT @EMCCC2: Meta-analysis finds no difference in mortality between high vs. low #MAP targets in adults with #shock given #vasopressors. Pat…
Pooled analysis of higher versus lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy septic and vasodilatory shock https://t.co/YSCz70wGKh
RT @EMCCC2: Meta-analysis finds no difference in mortality between high vs. low #MAP targets in adults with #shock given #vasopressors. Pat…
Meta-analysis finds no difference in mortality between high vs. low #MAP targets in adults with #shock given #vasopressors. Patients with chronic #hypertension did not benefit from higher MAP target. Odds of #arrhythmia 2.5x higher in high MAP group. h
RT @pus27: Important adult data. @DrSamRay @PICSociety @BarneyUoB @Dlawni @kalapappaj @Joethebaptist @lyvonnetume @RachelAgbeko @ICNARC - a…
https://t.co/U83WUqcJvx Controlling for trial and site, the OR for 28‑day mortality for the higher versus lower MAP targets was 1.15 (95% CI 0.87–1.52). What happened to the days when a CI crossed 1 it was considered not significant? #ConfidenceInterval #C
RT @pus27: Important adult data. @DrSamRay @PICSociety @BarneyUoB @Dlawni @kalapappaj @Joethebaptist @lyvonnetume @RachelAgbeko @ICNARC - a…
RT @pus27: Important adult data. @DrSamRay @PICSociety @BarneyUoB @Dlawni @kalapappaj @Joethebaptist @lyvonnetume @RachelAgbeko @ICNARC - a…
Very interesting data. https://t.co/GGSMlFnjMj
Important adult data. @DrSamRay @PICSociety @BarneyUoB @Dlawni @kalapappaj @Joethebaptist @lyvonnetume @RachelAgbeko @ICNARC - and near the top of our on our ‘must do’list for PICS-SG. Get working on the acronym...I’m starting with ‘PICABo’ https://t.co/a
Every Day more.convinced that #lessismore #sepsis https://t.co/glmg6aWKBN
RT @YaseenarabiYa: Targeting higher blood pressure targets may increase mortality in patients who have been treated with vasopressors for m…
Targeting higher blood pressure targets may increase mortality in patients who have been treated with vasopressors for more than 6 h. https://t.co/MasOGS60S4
Pooled analysis of higher versus lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy septic and vasodilatory shock https://t.co/79Oe8kjmoK #IntCareMed