↓ Skip to main content

Post genomics era for orchid research

Overview of attention for article published in Botanical Studies, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 117)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Post genomics era for orchid research
Published in
Botanical Studies, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40529-017-0213-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wen-Chieh Tsai, Anne Dievart, Chia-Chi Hsu, Yu-Yun Hsiao, Shang-Yi Chiou, Hsin Huang, Hong-Hwa Chen

Abstract

Among 300,000 species in angiosperms, Orchidaceae containing 30,000 species is one of the largest families. Almost every habitats on earth have orchid plants successfully colonized, and it indicates that orchids are among the plants with significant ecological and evolutionary importance. So far, four orchid genomes have been sequenced, including Phalaenopsis equestris, Dendrobium catenatum, Dendrobium officinale, and Apostaceae shengen. Here, we review the current progress and the direction of orchid research in the post genomics era. These include the orchid genome evolution, genome mapping (genome-wide association analysis, genetic map, physical map), comparative genomics (especially receptor-like kinase and terpene synthase), secondary metabolomics, and genome editing.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 20%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,752,080
of 13,603,115 outputs
Outputs from Botanical Studies
#23
of 117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,948
of 392,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Botanical Studies
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,603,115 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 117 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.