↓ Skip to main content

Theoretical peak FLOPS per instruction set: a tutorial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Supercomputing
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Theoretical peak FLOPS per instruction set: a tutorial
Published in
Journal of Supercomputing
DOI 10.1007/s11227-017-2177-5
Authors

Romain Dolbeau

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 50%
Engineering 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2017.
All research outputs
#4,811,109
of 8,882,101 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Supercomputing
#32
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,921
of 192,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Supercomputing
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,882,101 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.