↓ Skip to main content

Stability of class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with 3 and 4 premolar extractions

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Orthodontics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Stability of class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with 3 and 4 premolar extractions
Published in
Progress in Orthodontics, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s40510-014-0067-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guilherme Janson, Janine Araki, Sérgio Estelita, Leonardo T Camardella

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the occlusal stability of class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with 3 and 4 first premolar extractions. A sample of 156 dental casts from 52 patients with class II subdivision malocclusion was divided into two groups according to the extraction protocol. Group 1 comprised 24 patients treated with 3 premolar extractions and group 2 included 28 patients treated with 4 premolar extractions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 22%
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Professor 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unknown 15 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,020,621
of 12,440,542 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#54
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,071
of 279,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,440,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.