Title |
Seed and microsite limitation of recruitment in plant populations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Oecologia, September 1992
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00317624 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
O. Eriksson, J. Ehrlén |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 2% |
Brazil | 8 | 2% |
Spain | 4 | 1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Colombia | 2 | <1% |
Israel | 2 | <1% |
Argentina | 2 | <1% |
New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Other | 6 | 2% |
Unknown | 314 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 21% |
Researcher | 72 | 21% |
Student > Master | 45 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 33 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 7% |
Other | 65 | 19% |
Unknown | 39 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 198 | 56% |
Environmental Science | 84 | 24% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | <1% |
Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 1% |
Unknown | 52 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,783,090
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,479
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,987
of 18,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.