↓ Skip to main content

Admission of tetanus patients to the ICU: a retrospective multicentre study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Admission of tetanus patients to the ICU: a retrospective multicentre study
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13613-017-0333-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael Mahieu, Thomas Reydel, Adel Maamar, Jean-Marc Tadié, Angeline Jamet, Arnaud W. Thille, Nicolas Chudeau, Julien Huntzinger, Steven Grangé, Gaetan Beduneau, Anne Courte, Stephane Ehrmann, Jérémie Lemarié, Sébastien Gibot, Michael Darmon, Christophe Guitton, Julia Champey, Carole Schwebel, Jean Dellamonica, Thibaut Wipf, Ferhat Meziani, Damien Du Cheyron, Achille Kouatchet, Nicolas Lerolle

Abstract

An extended course of tetanus (up to 6 weeks) requiring ICU admission and protracted mechanical ventilation (MV) may have a significant impact on short- and long-term survival. The subject is noteworthy and deserves to be discussed. Twenty-two ICUs in France performed tetanus screenings on patients admitted between January 2000 and December 2014. Retrospective data were collected from hospital databases and through the registers of the town hall of the patients. Seventy patients were included in 15 different ICUs. Sixty-three patients suffered from severe or very severe tetanus according to the Ablett classification. The median age was 80 years [interquartile range 73-84], and 86% of patients were women. Ninety per cent of patients (n = 63) required MV for a median of 36 days [26-46], and 66% required administration of a neuromuscular-blocking agent for 23 days [14-29]. A nosocomial infection occurred in 43 patients (61%). ICU and 1-year mortality rates were 14% (n = 10) and 16% (n = 11), respectively. Forty-five per cent of deaths occurred during the first week. Advanced age, a higher SAPS II, any infection, and the use of vasopressors were significantly associated with a lower number of days alive without ventilator support by day 90. Age was the only factor that significantly differed between deceased and survivors at 1 year (83 [81-85] vs. 79 [73-84] years, respectively; p = 0.03). Sixty-one per cent of survivors suffered no impairment to their functional status. In a high-income country, tetanus mainly occurs in healthy elderly women. Despite prolonged MV and extended ICU length of stay, we observed a low 1-year mortality rate and good long-term functional status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Other 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Master 5 7%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 31 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Unspecified 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 28 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,343,308
of 25,340,976 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#629
of 1,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,948
of 339,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,340,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.