@WinnowingWind @RedDirtSooner @azhcanedition @NebraskaMegan Here is a paper for you, stating the obvious: 46XX testicular disorder is incongruence between phenotype and genetic sex. “Male” in the literature, including in this paper, refers to phenotype. h
@OuchThatsSharp @KatyMontgomerie where’d you get that? every source i can find says sry-negative xx males can have no sry gene https://t.co/4Gk35UVkVW https://t.co/7YveJoJAvO https://t.co/D2ysCJv0Rg
@turnspitter @FondOfBeetles @SwipeWright eg. in literature they mostly refer to 46,XX Testicular DSDs as male https://t.co/kY20FUoMxl https://t.co/L4u7BWOj88 https://t.co/sX2aKQwbYu https://t.co/ZepXCXyT9j
@Ex_CTRL_Left @queersurgeon Hey, you’re an expert - but you can’t use PubMed? https://t.co/P3rpbSXsCu
@Grisailleda @AnxietySugar_ Nice Wiki copy-pasta. This article says 80% https://t.co/P3rpbSXsCu I could find others that back my 75% - but even your 90% supports my argument (anything greater than one single example of an SRY-negative XX male supports my
RT @AlexAlicit: As for some cases? Here you go. These were all used when it came to writing and averaging out numbers, along with general m…
#genomeregulation 46,XX testicular disorder of sexual development with SRY-negative caused by some unidentified… http://t.co/962jJ2wA6n