↓ Skip to main content

Contrast Extravasation into the Right Upper Extremity

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Contrast Extravasation into the Right Upper Extremity
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11606-014-3120-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kip Mihara, Ganesh Devendra

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,719,218
of 12,348,320 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,181
of 4,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,269
of 269,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#129
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,348,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.