↓ Skip to main content

Beyond broken spines–what the radiologist needs to know about late complications of spinal cord injury

Overview of attention for article published in Insights Into Imaging, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Beyond broken spines–what the radiologist needs to know about late complications of spinal cord injury
Published in
Insights Into Imaging, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13244-014-0375-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erin Capps, Ken F. Linnau, Deborah A. Crane

Abstract

To describe expected imaging findings to assist the emergency room radiologist with recognising complications and pathology unique to the spinal cord injury (SCI) patient population to ensure rapid and accurate diagnosis.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Russia 1 4%
Unknown 25 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 21%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 68%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Psychology 1 4%
Unknown 6 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2015.
All research outputs
#10,037,145
of 12,545,426 outputs
Outputs from Insights Into Imaging
#276
of 367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,077
of 288,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights Into Imaging
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,545,426 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 367 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.